Topic: contradiction list of topics
start over

8 items are filed under this topic.

		Page 1/1

	A proof involving real numbers		2010-01-11
		From Amper: Let a,b is an element of real numbers, and suppose that for every x>0 we have a is lesser than or equal to b+x. (a) Show that a is lesser than or equal to b. (b) Show that it does not follow that a is lesser than b. i'm feeling bad of having no idea with this, hope i you can help me. GRACIAS!! Answered by Penny Nom.
	A radius and a tangent to a circle		2007-12-04
		From elizabeth: show that the radius of a circle meets a tangent line to the circle in a 90 degree angle. hint: start by assuming they are not perpendicular and at a contradiction. Answered by Penny Nom.
	Proof that any side of a triangle is less than half the perimeter.		2007-07-07
		From Omkar: Any side of a triangle is smaller than half of its perimeter, prove this in short ? Answered by Stephen La Rocque.
	An isosceles triangle		2005-01-03
		From Abraham: The question is,"Triangle ABC is not isosceles.Prove that if altitude BD were drawn, it would not bisect AC."My question is If an altitude is drawn wouldn\'t that mean automatically its isosceles because, In a triangle the sides opposite congruent angles(in this case the right angles)are congruent? What am I thinking wrong? Answered by Harley Weston.
	A theorem involving a trapezoid		2004-09-29
		From Abraham: Given:Trapezoid ROSE with diagonals RS and EO intersecting at point M Prove:Diagonals RS and EO do not bisect each other. Answered by Harley Weston.
	Contradiction in the Procedural Precedence and the Distributive property		2003-07-03
		From Arthur: When complicated expressions exist on both sides of a fraction, and both these expressions contain like and unlike terms with "literal" coefficients, the procedural precedence suddenly gets extremely confusing and seems impossible to simplify. This seems confusing and impossible to simplify because there is a HUGE contradiction in the way Procedural Precedence and the Distributive property deal with Parentheses. The Procedure says you MUST deal with what's INSIDE the parenthesis FIRST, BEFORE dealing with ANYTHING on the outside where as the Distributive property contradicts that by saying to go ahead and ignore the Precedence and use a factor on the outside of the Parenthesis. Answered by Claude Tardif.
	Two algebra problems		1999-12-17
		From Michael Standfest: If x+4 is a factor of 2x4+kx3-3kx2+6x-40, find k and Prove that n2-n is even for all n, using the proof of contradiction Answered by Penny Nom.
	Root 17 is Irrational		1999-01-21
		From John Murdock: If you could help me out with this I would appreciate it. Prove that the square root of 17 is irrational. Answered by Harley Weston.

		Page 1/1